Become part of the architecture validation
Three ways to work with us
The architecture is articulated, the ceramics implementation runs, ferritic high-performance ceramics is in development. What is missing: independent validation in a different material domain. If one of these three paths fits your situation, let us know.
You have your own MSE ontology
You have already built an ontology for your domain (polymers, metals, batteries, …) but you have hit the workflow-duplication wall. Adopt L0+L1 from OCO, attach your L2 — together we validate that the architecture holds.
You want your domain modelled
You have a specific material class for which no L2 module exists yet — and no capacity buffer for ontology engineering in your own team. We develop the module that fits the OCO toolkit. Details in Engineering services.
You want to review the architecture critically
You are an ontology engineer, a journal reviewer, or academically interested in the validation question. Write to us — we welcome critical feedback on the architecture and validation. No obligation to reply.
Direct contact
If none of the three paths above fits exactly, or if you have a specific question — just write to us. We typically respond within two business days.
OntoCrafter is a project by
“Our goal is to completely change the way YOU use documents to understand who YOU are and who OTHERS are.”
Please indicate in the subject line
- OCO Bridge: request to connect an existing ontology or format
- OCO Module: L2 development for a specific material class
- Tool: early access to OCO-Workbench or SIPOC-Extractor
- Architecture: academic discussion, reviewer request, pre-print
- General: anything that does not fit the other categories